<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ryan&#8217;s Election Reccomendations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arcanius.silverfir.net/blog/ryans-election-reccomendations/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arcanius.silverfir.net/blog/ryans-election-reccomendations</link>
	<description>The life and thoughts of Ryan McElroy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Zimmermann</title>
		<link>http://arcanius.silverfir.net/blog/ryans-election-reccomendations/comment-page-1#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Zimmermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 06:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arcanius.silverfir.net/wp/?p=440#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post, Ryan.  It sure would be great if editorials like this one showed up in the supplementary materials that come with your ballot.  The ballot descriptions of initiatives and candidates are always so boring, colorless, and often leave me so confused that, in the end, I don't really even know what I voted for (or against).

Even if only one side were provided (like in your post), a somewhat educated person like myself can either agree or disagree with the points you've made and vote accordingly.  Granted, I guess I have to have a certain level of trust in your reporting, but I do so this will work well for me.

Maybe these types of things are always available online now that we've hit such a digital age, but having it show up in my feed subscriptions automatically is just so nice ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post, Ryan.  It sure would be great if editorials like this one showed up in the supplementary materials that come with your ballot.  The ballot descriptions of initiatives and candidates are always so boring, colorless, and often leave me so confused that, in the end, I don&#8217;t really even know what I voted for (or against).</p>
<p>Even if only one side were provided (like in your post), a somewhat educated person like myself can either agree or disagree with the points you&#8217;ve made and vote accordingly.  Granted, I guess I have to have a certain level of trust in your reporting, but I do so this will work well for me.</p>
<p>Maybe these types of things are always available online now that we&#8217;ve hit such a digital age, but having it show up in my feed subscriptions automatically is just so nice ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stickman</title>
		<link>http://arcanius.silverfir.net/blog/ryans-election-reccomendations/comment-page-1#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Stickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arcanius.silverfir.net/wp/?p=440#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>Vote for me! Port commissioner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote for me! Port commissioner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
